Untouchability and Constitution of India

Reflections on Power, Equality, and the Indian Constitution

In the book Assembling India’s Constitution: A New Democratic History, the authors highlight a sobering historical reality: certain high-caste Hindu leaders, including the Shankaracharya, vehemently opposed the constitutional abolition of untouchability. It is a disheartening truth that human history is often defined by a resistance to equality. Across every culture and era, communities that hold the "upper hand" rarely relinquish it willingly; instead, they strive to preserve the hierarchies that benefit them.

The Universality of Hegemony

While this specific context is Indian, the phenomenon is global. We see this impulse toward supremacy reflected in many forms:

• Racial Supremacy: Where white-skinned populations have historically fought to retain dominance over "colored" people.

• Gender Hierarchy: Where men seek to preserve authority over women.

• Socio-Economic Power: Where the wealthy and the politically connected unite to protect their status at the expense of the marginalized.

The Vision of the Constituent Assembly

In light of these pressures, the wisdom of the Constituent Assembly must be lauded. Despite intense pushback, the committee remained steadfast, declaring all citizens equal and enshrining Universal Adult Franchise from the nation's inception. This was a radical act of faith in the common citizen.

The Debate Over the Voting Age

However, the later decision to lower the voting age from 21 to 18 remains a point of significant contention. One could argue that this change was less about empowering the youth and more about political survival—a move by the Congress party to capture a younger demographic.

There is a valid concern that civic maturity and a genuine concern for the nation’s future often develop only after an individual has "settled" into adult life, typically in their mid-to-late twenties. From this perspective, rather than lowering the age to 18, the government might have better served the country by raising it to 25, ensuring a more experienced electorate. This shift highlights how even democratic reforms can be influenced by a desire to retain power.

The Search for a Social Revolution

What the world truly requires is a "social revolution" led by a collective that believes unseweringly in the equality of all humanity and the right of every living being to live freely. But in a world so deeply fractured by divisiveness, we must ask: where will such a group emerge? Is a global shift toward true equality even possible, or is the human drive for dominance too deeply ingrained to be overcome?

(Improved by Gemini)

Misogyny in India

 In the book excerpt from the book The Song of the Clay Pot by Sumana Chandrashekar the author says that the world of Carnatic Music is full of misogyny. The male artistes refuse to have a female percussionist. The reasons are never known, it is just that it is a tradition.

Traditions arise due to various circumstances and become entrenched in the society. It becomes difficult to shake them. At the same time not trying to change a tradition which does not align with the current right thoughts, with right reasoning, needs to be considered.

In this example it is important that newer artistes start breaking the taboo and let women percussionists play alongside them. The women can lead the change, even if the men do not wish a change.

This has to happen vehemently, but silently. It has to send a message to those artistes not willing to take on a women percussionists, "Look, you are in minority". If this movement is kick started then it will take at least a generation for the men to accept this change.

This kind of misogyny is present not just in Carnatic Music, but is present in every facet of life, in every part of the world, including the so called "progressive", "advanced" nations of the West that pride themselves in leading the change. They forget that their women were not allowed to vote for a very long time and even today women change their name, not the men. The children take the name of the father, not that of the mother. By default in most societies the inheritance goes to the male children.

All this needs to change. The biggest driver will be education. The teachers (given that many of them are women) have to start driving these aspects into the heads of the children right from the beginning. The stress has to be on equality of gender and mutual respect for humans (irrespective of any difference between them) has to be cultivated from childhood, for the society to change and become better.

Expecting the privileged men to take this step is foolhardy. Will the women who, are the most of time guilty of discriminating against their daughters and even more towards their daughters-in-law take up the gauntlet to bring about the change?