If you have not seen this, see this. It is a very different take on the Apple Vs. Samsung at The most amazing iPhone yet.
Thoughts that come to the mind expressed in the Internet realm. Chintanaigal pronounced chin-than-aye-cle (as in cubicle))
Labels
Book Review
(429)
Java
(41)
India
(33)
Ecuador Travelogue
(32)
Tourism
(29)
PMD
(26)
Static Code Checks
(25)
Ian Rankin
(22)
Philosophy
(15)
Jeffrey Archer
(12)
Guayaquil
(11)
John Le Carre
(11)
China
(10)
GIDS
(10)
Corruption
(8)
Douglas Crockford
(8)
PEC
(7)
Pondicherry Engineering College
(7)
Quito
(7)
Reservation
(7)
Tena
(6)
Chetan Bhagat
(5)
Pakistan
(5)
Women
(5)
Amazon Forest
(4)
Amitav Ghosh
(4)
Class of 1989
(4)
Haiku
(4)
Human Rights
(4)
Technology
(4)
Ashwin Sanghi
(3)
ECE
(3)
Ebook Reader
(3)
Ecuador
(3)
Graham Greene
(3)
Martin Fowler
(3)
Photography
(3)
Steve Jobs
(3)
Tata Group
(3)
Cs of Code Quality
(2)
Death
(2)
IISc
(2)
IT
(2)
Refactoring
(2)
TCS
(2)
iPhone
(2)
Andean Condor
(1)
Arvind Adiga
(1)
Brahma Kamal
(1)
CEDT
(1)
Cache Memory
(1)
Center of the Earth
(1)
Chanakya
(1)
Class of 1991
(1)
Coriolis Effect
(1)
David Suzuki
(1)
Equator
(1)
Fredrick Forsyth
(1)
Galapagos Turtle
(1)
Garbage Collection
(1)
Gwendoline Riley
(1)
Job
(1)
Joe Hewitt
(1)
Programming Paradigms
(1)
Ramadorai
(1)
S Sudarshan
(1)
Swami Rama
(1)
Tara Cullis
(1)
Walter Isaacson
(1)
iCon
(1)
Showing posts with label Samsung. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Samsung. Show all posts
Monday, September 03, 2012
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
Apple tells Samsung what not to do
Read for a hilarious post on what Apple has asked Samsung not to do to avoid violations. http://www.pcworld.com/article/245493/apple_to_samsung_dont_make_thin_or_rectangular_tablets_or_smartphones.html.
It is clearly an abuse of patents. Apple cannot mandate that nobody else should be able to make flat, rectangular, thin tablets or smart phones.
Apple probably has genuine grievance against Samsung for certain violations, but the above requests are in complete violation of the spirit of patent's law.
The patent's office should also give a lot of thought before granting a patent to the technical companies.
Applying of very generic patents covering everything seems to be the trend of all companies so that they can sue others at the drop of a hat.
It is clearly an abuse of patents. Apple cannot mandate that nobody else should be able to make flat, rectangular, thin tablets or smart phones.
Apple probably has genuine grievance against Samsung for certain violations, but the above requests are in complete violation of the spirit of patent's law.
The patent's office should also give a lot of thought before granting a patent to the technical companies.
Applying of very generic patents covering everything seems to be the trend of all companies so that they can sue others at the drop of a hat.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)